Even as rabid fans and Warner Bros. executives are at long
last celebrating the arrival of the Watchmen movie, one of the men most responsible
for the Hugo Award-winning tale of
fallen superheroes living in an age of impending nuclear war – author Alan Moore
– couldn’t care less.
Just ask his partner in creation, artist Dave Gibbons.
“Alan doesn’t want to talk to me or anyone else about Watchmen
ever again,” Gibbons says gravely. “I am sad that
he’s had such bad experiences with movies, and I wish he could share with me
something I consider a good experience.
“Alan has been very dissatisfied with productions prior to
this one and has decided he doesn’t want to play ball with Hollywood anymore.
Most people would leave their name on it and take the money, but Alan is made
of sterner stuff.” (Moore famously refuses a paycheck or even nominal credit
for adaptations of his stories.)
While cinematic takes on Moore’s intensely dark visions have ranged
from the misguided (The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen) to the transcendently entertaining
(V for
Vendetta), his most hotly contested
property has languished as little more than a Hollywood rumor for more than 20
years while directors including Terry Gilliam, Darren Aronofsky and The
Bourne Ultimatum’s Paul Greengrass came and
went.
When Gilliam concluded that no feature-length film could do
justice to the epic Watchmen fantasy,
Moore and Gibbons (who also collaborated on the Superman story “For the
Man Who Has Everything”) were inclined
to agree. Neither held his breath as blockbuster producer Joel Silver tried
repeatedly to revive the project, once suggesting Arnold Schwarzenegger as its
star.
Gibbons, 59, recalls that episode with a laugh, observing
that reinventing the brooding Watchmen
as a simple action extravaganza would have been seriously misguided. But
because his own experiences with Hollywood have been mostly positive, he
remained open to the idea, with Moore’s blessing, when this latest incarnation,
directed by 300’s Zack Snyder,
began to take shape.
“As far as this new movie is concerned, the producers and
director had no obligation to speak to me, and the fact that they have, and
that they’ve listened so much, has been to the benefit of the final thing. I
had a gut feeling they’d do right by Alan and I, and that’s proven to be the
case.”
Gibbons admits he’s a bit tired of talking about Watchmen
– after 23 years, you would be too – and has
remained prolific in his career as an illustrator and the author of his own
comics, including the Albion
spin-off Thunderbolt Jaxon. But
having recently produced Watching the Watchmen, a behind-the-scenes book about
the novel’s creation
featuring rarely seen sketches and character prototypes, and because of his
enthusiasm for Snyder’s film, he’s not about to declare a Moore-style
moratorium on the subject quite yet.
He doesn’t consider the Watchmen movie a definitive validation
of the book or his
role in creating it – but he is satisfied that it captures, however improbably,
the bold spirit of the original work.
“Neither Alan nor I ever felt that the ultimate fulfillment
of Watchmen was that it be turned into a
movie,” he says. “It is a comic book or graphic novel, whatever you want to
call it, and that’s a very respectable medium in its own right. If Watchmen
had stood only as that, we would have been perfectly
happy.
“But they made a movie, and it’s amazing, a rich, dense lump
of cinema that requires more than one viewing. You’ll want to see it again to
really experience it. So how could I be unhappy with that?”